We’ve updated our Terms of Use to reflect our new entity name and address. You can review the changes here.
We’ve updated our Terms of Use. You can review the changes here.

World of tanks tier 10

by Main page

about

Premium Tanks

Click here: => spicotabes.fastdownloadcloud.ru/dt?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzA6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZHRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjI6IldvcmxkIG9mIHRhbmtzIHRpZXIgMTAiO30=


Their flaws generally outweight their pros. Find what your strong points and weaknesses are. I've done the china tree already once, so I know Chi-Ha is indeed great with the best gun, however without free xp, it's not happening until you unlock the tier 4, and the other guns suck bad so.

These tanks are generally terrible and need major buffs in order to be viable in current meta. What you said I agree with, I don't find the tank to be brilliant at all. I've got 3 more missions for the Obj260. The Russian hovermeds are fun as hell.

Tier 10 light tanks in WoT

Today, I thought it would be fun to put together a tier list for tier 10 tanks in World of Tanks, but I need your help. Basically, it's how the community would sort tanks, from best to worst, based on their average ranking. Based on these rankings, you can put the tanks into groups. For example, an average ranking of 1. Tanks with similar scores would be put into the same group, so world of tanks tier 10 would say that tanks in the same group are all of comparable quality, but tanks in group A are better than tanks in group C. World of Tanks has a whopping 61 tier 10 tanks currently in the game, and I don't know how many people are willing to rank all 61 of them, so to make things easier I am instead asking people to rank the vehicles in each class, and then pick the best 10 and worst 10 vehicles overall you don't have to rank the rest. Lastly, because random battles are rather different from competitive play, I have two different surveys that you can fill out. Feel free to share this survey. Great, where do I take the surveys. Each survey takes about 10 minutes to complete. I will leave the surveys open all month, and it will likely take some time to process the data, so expect results sometime around the middle of September. I world of tanks tier 10 played almost every tier 10 heavy at some point. And since I have played Smash Bros series for long, I am familiar with tier-lists, and making one for WoT was quite fun. My ranking system is similar to Smash Bros, S-tier being the top, with A, B, C. Stuff like completely unbuffed Type 5 and Maus right after gold was made available for credits are F-tier level of bad, and none of the not counting stock tier 10 heavies are on that level. Their pros outweight their cons. Generally the biggest contributors for the general powercreep at tier 10. They have a lot of advantages that make them great, or certain few things that make them strong. Some of these tanks may be slightly powercreeped, with just a few buffs being enough to bump them up and making them way more viable. This tier may also contain tanks that are notably outclassed by high-tier vehicles. Almost completely outclassed by higher tiers. Their flaws generally outweight their pros. These tanks are generally powercreeped and clearly needs buffs to be viable in current meta. These tanks are generally terrible and need major buffs in order to be viable in current meta. They might still have positive traits, but their cons significantly outweight their pros. I have purple recents so I hope it means something. I was gonna write up explanations, but that would make the post overly long, so if some of the placements puzzles you, just ask me. Its just the gun that really makes difference here - E 100 with 128mm is so bad that it's E-tier material at best, maybe even F-tier, but the 750 alpha bumps it to C-tier. The platform of those two is not great; it has holes everywhere and its slow-ish. You probably can compare them to Mario and Dr. Mario in Super Smash Bros 4 - they have basically identical moveset apart from two moves that function differently, have similar hurtbox and so on. The only differences are the mobility, range and power with Dr Mario having worse range and mobility but stronger movesbut in the end they make such a big difference that Mario is a high-tier character while Dr. Mario is close to bottom-tier. I'll just keep them where they are as they more or less match the average opinion about the tank. I'm perfectly aware that Doc is considered better than Mario in Melee, though. Sure, it's pros turret armor, depression are amazing, but the cons massively outweight its pros. And it doesn't even have a niche anymore - Sconq also gets more or less invincible turret with -10 depression - with much more other stuff that Kran never world of tanks tier 10. And it suffers from 3-5-7, too - can you imagine a Kranvagn matched against a Type 5 Heavy. Kranvagn is hard to fix because its not fun to fight against and buffing it too much would easily make it gamebreaking, because it's a very minmaxed vehicle, and those tanks are often the ones that can end up being broken. However, it's quite unique so I would probably keep its current concept the way it is now. Its still not very high but it can take 1 more hit from arties, Types and probably even 183s. I don't know if that is enough, but it should certainly help and like said, megabuffing a such tank at once is too risky. It still has major drawbacks; it just has less of them and some of them are less drastic. I don't know too much about the Object 277, only that its a new tank and thus better than any other tier 10 heavy tank in the Soviet tech tree. Why is it A-tier and not S-tier or B-tier. I've heard arguments between which is better, 50B or T 57. Why do you lean towards the T 57. It gets stomped in competitive games but in random matches, its gun handling, mobility for German heaviesand very weird weakspots and good silver pen makes it a decent C-tier tank. It is good against tier 8s, actually, but it suffers once when it has to fight tier 8s. I'm not exactly sure how to position bottom tier tanks, though. The difference on powerlevel between the bottom tier tanks is not huge, and it's not too big from D-tier, either, so while it is atm the worst, it isn't the worst by huge margin. I know it's not possible with this survey system, but it would be amazing if the survey would place the tanks in the final question in the order within each class you put on previous questions. That would have saved me a bunch of time filling it in. I ended up doing that then filtering each class through the ones listed earlier. I get the desire to do a rack and stack ranking system, but an optional approach could have been to do both tier banding, and priority within tier - would have made the process a bit less tedious for selecting. For example, the first set could have been to assign a tier ranking per tank within the category S-tier, A, B, C, etc or similarand then have folks rank individually from there if they chose to do so. When you have 19 tanks in one category, the functional difference between being ranked 4 and 5 is hard to define, but you can say, this is in the top tier, and this is not a bit more easily. I would have liked to do something similar, but unfortunately it wasn't possible, short of me spending hundreds of hours building my own world of tanks tier 10 collection website. I wouldn't worry too much about exactly which tanks you put at 4 or 5, because in theory, it'll all average out and I'll be able to easily group them later. I've been reading about voting and election systems for a while now, and I made this into Condorcet style pairwise competition. Within each class all tanks went 1 vs 1 in my head, and I gave the better one a point. That created the ranking within class. Then for combined ranking I always took the top tanks from each class, and pit them against each other 1v1. One tank had highest points, so I put it on the combined list, and removed it from the competition. Then I replaced the removed tank with the next best in its class and repeated. Not the fastest way to do this ranking, but those who are into this kind of stuff can appreciate that I elected the Condorcet winner as my number 1 tank.

I think it is fairly close between the is-7 t110 and is-4. Some of these tanks appear in gift shop bundles from time to time, and others are available through other purchase methods see specific articles for details. T110E3 - A pitiful victim of powercreep, the T110E3 is a rarity to see on any Blitz battlefield. Interested to see what exactly the World of Tanks developers are preparing for their players? If you need to take over your account, make sure to contact us before, instead of interrupting our player's sessions. I don't use premium much and am more of a casual player, but I am skilled. The cupola is an easy penetration. Their flaws generally outweight their pros. What you said I agree with, I don't find the tank to be brilliant at all. Also, best to have hard cover to pull forward into after every shot. Kranvagn is hard to fix because its not fun to fight against and buffing it too much would easily make it gamebreaking, because it's a very minmaxed vehicle, and those tanks are often the ones that can end up being broken.

credits

released January 12, 2019

tags

about

stominancon Madison, Wisconsin

contact / help

Contact stominancon

Streaming and
Download help

Report this album or account

If you like World of tanks tier 10, you may also like: